<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grow a &#8216;stache</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/12/grow-a-stache/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/12/grow-a-stache/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:17:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prof. Nerdtron 3000</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/12/grow-a-stache/comment-page-1/#comment-1126</link>
		<dc:creator>Prof. Nerdtron 3000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdbaseball.com/?p=1245#comment-1126</guid>
		<description>I used single year statistics. After all, the nerd card is a single snapshot of a player, and how do we know &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/08/jeff-mcknight/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jeff McKnight&lt;/a&gt;[1] didn&#039;t shave the next year? So the approach I used was to look up his 1991 OPS+, which is the season that corresponds to his card. As far as there being a bigger difference among baseball players in general, who knows, but the nerds are a surprisingly and disappointingly average bunch. Those boxplots are centered around plus-statistics of 100; the nerds don&#039;t seem unusually talentless at baseball.

[1] I would have guessed, based on card alone, that McKnight would have been the least productive nerd, but that&#039;s not the case. He did play baseball like a 14 year old high school freshman lost between his locker and the computer lab, OPS+ of 15, but there are several players worse. Any guesses?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used single year statistics. After all, the nerd card is a single snapshot of a player, and how do we know <a href="http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/08/jeff-mcknight/" rel="nofollow">Jeff McKnight</a>[1] didn&#8217;t shave the next year? So the approach I used was to look up his 1991 OPS+, which is the season that corresponds to his card. As far as there being a bigger difference among baseball players in general, who knows, but the nerds are a surprisingly and disappointingly average bunch. Those boxplots are centered around plus-statistics of 100; the nerds don&#8217;t seem unusually talentless at baseball.</p>
<p>[1] I would have guessed, based on card alone, that McKnight would have been the least productive nerd, but that&#8217;s not the case. He did play baseball like a 14 year old high school freshman lost between his locker and the computer lab, OPS+ of 15, but there are several players worse. Any guesses?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Nerd</title>
		<link>http://www.nerdbaseball.com/2009/12/grow-a-stache/comment-page-1/#comment-1125</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Nerd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nerdbaseball.com/?p=1245#comment-1125</guid>
		<description>Great analysis, though I&#039;m curious if you were looking at career numbers or single season numbers.  I might also expect the difference between facial hair and clean-shaven to be larger among non-nerds, given those players tend to be more evenly distributed in talent from bad to great while nerds, unfortunately, tend to be skewed towards poor stats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis, though I&#8217;m curious if you were looking at career numbers or single season numbers.  I might also expect the difference between facial hair and clean-shaven to be larger among non-nerds, given those players tend to be more evenly distributed in talent from bad to great while nerds, unfortunately, tend to be skewed towards poor stats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

