Click the stars to vote: 
(14 votes, average: 4.36 out of 5)
Loading ...
Another “repeat nerd,” Mr. Garrelts has become eligible for the lifetime achievement award. You can check out his first appearance here.
Mr. Garrelts had several good-to-great seasons for the Giants, including 1989, in which he led the National League in ERA.
I like how the glare on his glasses makes his eyes look as if he’s “powering-up” Teen Wolf style.
Click the stars to vote: 
(16 votes, average: 3.38 out of 5)
Loading ...
Mr. Bradley was the person who gave Hall-of-Famer Rich Gossage his nickname, “Goose.”
Gwen Knapp of the San Francisco Chronicle wrote a piece on the Giants’ Pablo Sandoval, who had a monster game yesterday as the team launched a PR offensive to garner votes for Kung Fu Panda as the write-in All Star.
She quotes infield coach and noted baseball strategist Shawon Dunston, who elegantly articulated the evils and selfishness of talking walks when discussing the Giant slugger:
“I’m sorry, but you walk 80 times a year, and you don’t hit .300 ever in your career, you’re not that good,” he said. “But he’s up there, putting it on the line. Guys who walk a lot, they say they have a good eye. Maybe they’re just protecting their average. They’re protecting their average, cheating the game.”
Clearly, taking a walk – and not making an out – exemplifies the unwholesome influence of Ayn Rand in baseball. As a lifelong Giants fan, I’m glad that neither Sandoval nor Bengie Molina (who at one point this season had an OBP lower than his BA!) selfishly take walks and don’t cheat the game.
After all, what’s the point of getting on base when Fred Lewis and Rich Aurilia are behind you in the lineup anyway? Walking would just pump up those useless OBP numbers at the expense of F-Lew’s GIDP numbers. That, my fellow nerds, is not what baseball is about.
Click the stars to vote: (13 votes, average: 3.62 out of 5)
Loading ...
On August 24, 1975, Mr. Halicki threw a no-hitter against the New York Mets. So far, this is the first documented nerd-thrown-no-hitter.
While not a nerd, per se, I just had to share what might be the most inexplicable baseball card in the nerd archives.
Click the stars to vote: (12 votes, average: 2.75 out of 5)
Loading ...
Seriously. What is going on here?
1) According to wikipedia and baseball-reference, Fleer misspelled Mr. Riles first name (Ernest, not Earnest).
2) He was obviously posing in his batting stance. Whose decision was it to let his head overlap the border, but let the bat get cut off so it looks like he’s in some strange yoga pose?
3) Really? You can’t show his whole body? Is there a precedent for this type of photo cropping?
4) Did someone take a landscape shot of the outfield grass, and then photoshop Mr. Riles into it, except they didn’t know how to resize the second image?
I demand answers. And despite having a career OPS+ of 89, Mr. Riles deserves better.
Today we offer part one in the ongoing series, “Can You Believe That This Is An Actual Baseball Card That The Fleer Corporation Was Not Embarrassed to Produce and For Which People Paid Actual Money?!”
Was the photographer given a strict limit of one frame per player? Did they just roll down the window and wave the camera in Mr. Minton’s direction as they zoomed by in their car? Was the picture taken through a wet paper towel? Did the editors at Fleer think that the blurriness of the text would distract collectors from the blurriness of the picture? I demand answers…
Click the stars to vote: (20 votes, average: 4.05 out of 5)
Loading ...
Does anyone else get the feeling this guy should be wearing one of those painters' cap Pirates uniforms?
(4.74 out of 5) (4.73 out of 5) (4.73 out of 5) (4.68 out of 5) (4.67 out of 5)
