Posts Tagged ‘Mets’

The little things that kill…

Sunday, February 15th, 2009 by I Love Nerd York City

That’s right, I’m dropping a Bush reference from 1994…after reading this article from newyorkmets.com, I’ve been trying to distance myself from reality as much as possible. As far as I’m concerned, I’m still a freshman in high-school, and I expect to see the OJ car chase on TV:

In a scenario Manuel has contemplated, Castillo would bat leadoff, a position not unfamiliar to him, and Reyes, who has no career plate appearances as a No. 3 hitter, would bat third. Beltran could then bat second, a slot in which he has prospered in the past.

Luis Castillo leading off for a playoff-hopeful team is what I was expecting to complain about when I clicked on that article…little did I know that an ambush on my baseball-loving sensibilities was lurking Jeff Gillooly style.

After preaching a team-first mantra, Jerry Manuel turns into a bit of a basket case (#1 on the US Rock Charts).

The manager even went so far as to suggest a player who goes hitless in four at-bats but does the “little things” to help the team in one game might be rewarded the following day and have a better chance to play than a teammate who had two hits in four at-bats but did nothing to enhance the greater good.

What exactly will these hypothetical players be doing that will be more valuable than getting two hits? Is a catcher going to be throwing out 8 runners in the same game? Is a player going to be getting walks in 6 consecutive plate appearance? Is he going to make three home-run-robbing catches over the wall?  Will the guy who gets two hits also make four errors?

Manuel called it “kind of a ticklish situation”and noted, “We have to applaud and celebrate the little things.”

Ladies and gentlemen, major league baseball’s first ticklish situation! It’s like that good natured man with special needs always says, “stupid is as stupid does.”

Let’s just sign David Eckstein and get it over with.

I die a little inside…

Wednesday, February 11th, 2009 by I Love Nerd York City

…every time a Mets headline goes something like this instead of something like this in the year that they’re moving into a new stadium.

Really?

Thursday, January 29th, 2009 by I Love Nerd York City

From Bill Price (The Bitter Bill) of the NY Daily News:

I can see it now. It’s Sunday, Sept. 6 and the Mets are clinging to a 3-game lead over the Phillies in the NL East. They are trying to avoid a 3-game sweep at the hands of the Cubs at new Shea.

The Mets send Oliver Perez to the hill, looking to stem the tide, while the Cubs counter with their 18-game winner and leader in the NL Cy Young award race. This new Cubs ace shuts the Mets out over 8 innings, sending them to their third straight loss and on their way to another September collapse.

Ah, I guess it’s never too early to start worrying about which Cubs Cy Young candidate is going to kill the Mets this September. Ok Bill, who should I be having nightmares about…Zambrano? No? Ok, Harden? Still no dice? Maybe lightning strikes twice…Dempster? Oh, I see you said “new Cubs ace!”  I guess your’re going for the angle that the Peavy talks will be rekindled. No? Then who?

The pitcher’s name: Aaron Heilman.

It, of course, is a Mets’ fans worst nightmare, and honestly, wouldn’t surprise me if it became a reality.

Oh.

Really? You mean the same Aaron Heilman who has a career record of 5-13 in 25 career starts? With a 5.93 ERA?

Who knows, maybe Heilman will work out as a solid #3 or #4 guy with a change of scenery and a shot at the rotation (something he’s always wanted), but if I’m going to start worrying about the Cubs pitching, Heilman is way down on my list.

Full disclosure: Would I rather have rolled the dice with Heilman as the Mets #5 than Tim Redding? Yeah.

Why not Manny?

Wednesday, January 28th, 2009 by I Love Nerd York City

As a Mets fan living in Boston, I got to watch Manny play hundreds of times over the past 7 years, including all of last July, when popular opinion now says that he was tanking it and dogging his way out of Boston, actively sabotaging the Red Sox season. To clarify: sitting out two games in a contract protest…inexcusable. Going crazy and pushing an old man down because he couldn’t get you enough tickets…nuts. OPS’ing 1.060 while batting .347 in July…NOT tanking it. So let’s move on…

With that in mind, can someone explain to me why the Mets seem to have no interest in signing this guy?

Mets 2008 payroll: 138.6 million
Mets current 2009 payroll: approx. 123 million

So the Mets have about 15 mill to spend before they reach last year’s payroll, and about 40 mill before they reach the luxury tax threshold. I figure they’ll spend 10 mill on their next starter (Perez or Sheets).

Looking further down the line, the Mets have about 40 million coming off the books after the 2009 season (Delgado 12, Wagner 10.5, Schneider 5, Castro 2.5, Redding 2.5, Cora 2, Tatis 2, Anderson 1, Schoenweis 1.5). Unfortunately, compared to this year, next year’s FA class seems to have a big drop-off in high end talent.

So unless the Madoff swindling is actually affecting the Mets payroll, why not sign Manny for 2 or 3 years? It would bump them way up over last years payroll, but still not over the luxury tax threshold…in a year when theyre opening a new stadium. I understand the need for payroll flexibility, but even if they had Manny for 3 years, he’d still come off their books after the 2011 season, when they’re currently set to lose control of Reyes and Beltran. David Wright is under their control through 2013.  I realize his defense will cost them some runs in LF, but still…

Why not get Manny?! Or at least Adam Dunn…